Restoring Diverse, Invasion-Resistant, Wetland Prairies
Project Update
- History
Can restored wetlands resist invasion by weeds? We're looking for ways to give native plants an advantage while keeping the door closed to invaders. And we're hoping to find a way to do this that can help restored wetlands anywhere.
Background
The City of Eugene,
Lane Council of Governments (LCOG), and the Institute for Applied
Ecology (IAE) were awarded an EPA Wetland Program Development Grant that
began in early 2010 to study methods of improving wetland prairie
restoration through innovations in restoration process and long-term
management techniques. Specifically, the study will focus on methods to
manage plant communities with a goal of retaining a high level of native
diversity while maintaining resistance to weed invasion. A commonly
encountered problem with wetland prairie restoration is the trade-off
between maximizing native cover (of a few dominant species, often
grasses) and maximizing native diversity. While high cover of native
grasses inhibits weed invasion, a diverse native plant community is
essential for providing key ecosystem services (pollinators, nutrient
cycling) and wildlife habitat. The discussion the Experts Workshop held
at LCOG on January 12, 2010 was used as the starting point for
development of the research questions, experimental design, and
timeline.
Summary of Research
We are testing four management techniques to determine plant community response. The management techniques include:
- Grazing (sheep)
- Mowing
- Haying (mowing + removing thatch)
- Ecological Burning
Following
the implementation of the management treatments, the plots were seeded
with three different native seed mixes, plus small areas were seeded
with common invasive plants that are the focus of weed control in
wetland prairie restorations. The plots will be monitored for native
plant community establishment and invisibility through 2013.
Test Plots :
We are utilizing our existing wetland prairie restoration test plots
located at Coyote Prairie, just to the west of Eugene. There are a
total of 50 12x12 meter test plots that were established in 2005. At the
initiation of this project, the plots contained a relatively low
diversity, but mostly native, plant community with some variability
between plots. Each of the management techniques listed above was
applied to 10 randomly placed test plots, with 10 plots reserved for
control (no management).
Progress to Date
- Research Plan completed (May 2010)
- Quality Assurance Plan completed (June 2010)
- Baseline vegetation monitoring completed (June/July 2010)
- Grazing – 20 sheep per plot for a 24 hour period (June 2010)
Seeding strategy
In general, it has been
found that plots with high native plant abundance tend to be more
resistance to invasion by exotic plants. However, it is not always clear
what is responsible for this relationship. Although species diversity
has been found to be important for providing invasion resistance, it has
also been found that this may be because plots with high species
diversity have a higher chance of containing species that are strong
competitors. Other studies have found that it isn’t species diversity
per se, but rather the diversity of functional groups (annual forbs,
perennial grasses, etc.) that provides for invasion resistance. Our
study has been designed to tease out the influence of these different
factors – the # of species, # of functional groups, and native dominance
(# of individuals of each species) in weed invasion.
In
mid-October 2010 we added native seed to 3 quarters of all 50 plots,
resulting in four seeding treatments per plot (no seed, low, med, and
high diversity mixes). Species were included in the seed mix based on
availability and suitability. We identified 8 functional groups and had
1, 2, or 3 species randomly chosen from each, with the exception that 2
functional groups only had 2 species. The total # of species in each mix
was 8, 16, and 22.
Weed seed was subsequently added to 10cm x 2 m
strips in each quarter of each plot. We used 50 live seeds each of
Vulpia spp., Festuca arundinacea, Holcus lanatus, Rubus armeniacus,
Hypochaeris radicata, Mentha pelugium, Daucus carota, Lythrum
hyssopifolia (species that are already common to the area). All
seedlings were removed from the plots after monitoring.
Weed monitoring
IAE
monitored the seeded weed strips in June and July, 2011. Although the
data has yet to be analyzed, we observed that weed abundance tended to
be higher in the plots that were treated with prescribed fire and lowest
in control and mow plots. However, the plots that had been burned also
appeared to have the highest diversity of native plants.
Future activities
This project is currently expected to continue through 2014. Future project activities include:
- Monitoring community diversity in all plots (2013)
- Repeating weed seeding and monitoring (2012-2013)
- ‘Mini-experiment’ to test the effect of seed predation on restoration projects (2011-2013).
- ‘Mini-experiment’ to test the role of micro-topography in creating diverse native plant communities (2011-2013).
- Final results from this research should be compiled and available in late 2013.
-
Two wetland prairie restoration "Mobile Workshops" are tentatively
planned for May/June 2013 and will include an overview of research
results and a step-by-step tutorial on wetland prairie restoration
methods.
Your contact information:
If you
would like to receive e-mails directly, and receive future updates and
notified be about the mobile workshops please send an email to Jeff
Krueger at jkrueger@lcog.org and we will add you to the distribution list.
Staffing changes
This
past summer, Amanda Stanley left IAE to become the Conservation Program
Officer at the Wilburforce Foundation. Although we are very sad to see
her go, we are happy that she has this new opportunity. Andrea Thorpe,
the Conservation Research Program Director at IAE, will be taking over
Amanda’s role as lead researcher on this project. Andrea has been
involved with this project from the start and has hit the ground
running. Feel free to contact Andrea with questions about this ongoing
research effort at andrea@appliedeco.org.